Coil over shock setup

sandy

Gold forum user
CAT Member
Messages
349
Decided to replace the QA1's that came with the front end with some 'Racing' shocks from AFCO. You know they are good because they say 'Racing' right on the shock. The new ones are double adjustable style, and a good quality shock. The initial springs that were shipped with the front end were something like 225 or 250 lbs/in springs, which were way way to soft, I think even for a street car. I think this spring rate was for a stock Tiger, but I think with the way (angle) the coil overs are mounted the resulting effective spring rate is reduced a bit to something like 90%. So out they will also go.

On the shelf was a pair of 10" (same length spring as the QA1's) 500 lbs/in that were a lower spring rate for my Mustang. Perfect, good to go, again or so I think. I go to assemble the Afco 'Racing' shocks and find that with the top hat that holds the spring a 10" is too long. So back to Summit for a couple of springs, this time 8" in length, ordered 2 sets, 450 and 500's just to be covered. Well that is unless I need a 400 set, who knows.

Also added roller bearings to the bottom adjuster to make it easy to set up the ride height as needed.

Lastly the old QA1's had poly type of rod end bushings, the width is 1.5" and the Afco's use regular steel rod end style that is 0.25" narrower, so a few spacers ordered (not shown) from McMaster Carr to solve that mess.

20240803_123632.jpg


20240803_123728.jpg


20240803_123734.jpg


20240803_123739.jpg


20240813_142232.jpg


20240817_100925.jpg


20240817_102115.jpg


20240817_102437.jpg


20240817_103008.jpg
 

IvaTiger

Gold forum user
Messages
593
Decided to replace the QA1's that came with the front end with some 'Racing' shocks from AFCO. You know they are good because they say 'Racing' right on the shock. The new ones are double adjustable style, and a good quality shock. The initial springs that were shipped with the front end were something like 225 or 250 lbs/in springs, which were way way to soft, I think even for a street car. I think this spring rate was for a stock Tiger, but I think with the way (angle) the coil overs are mounted the resulting effective spring rate is reduced a bit to something like 90%. So out they will also go.

On the shelf was a pair of 10" (same length spring as the QA1's) 500 lbs/in that were a lower spring rate for my Mustang. Perfect, good to go, again or so I think. I go to assemble the Afco 'Racing' shocks and find that with the top hat that holds the spring a 10" is too long. So back to Summit for a couple of springs, this time 8" in length, ordered 2 sets, 450 and 500's just to be covered. Well that is unless I need a 400 set, who knows.

Also added roller bearings to the bottom adjuster to make it easy to set up the ride height as needed.

Lastly the old QA1's had poly type of rod end bushings, the width is 1.5" and the Afco's use regular steel rod end style that is 0.25" narrower, so a few spacers ordered (not shown) from McMaster Carr to solve that mess.

View attachment 20014

View attachment 20015

View attachment 20016

View attachment 20017

View attachment 20018

View attachment 20019

View attachment 20020

View attachment 20021

View attachment 20022
Nice stuff !
 
Top