Congratulations on the progress. Very impressive.
Are you going to have the trans rebuilt as a wide ratio unit?
I haven't given it much thought (until now) what are the advantages? I have driven my car in the past (first time I was 17....I am now 60!) as I knew all of the previous owners. It's been a long time since I drove it (over 30 years). I recall it being a lot of fun but I don't know what the difference in gear sets would be.
[/QUOTE]If I may ask, what was the approximate cost of having the gas tank work done? Were they just cleaned or did you also have them galvanized? Thinking about doing both things to my tanks but have not gotten to the point of getting a quote. Would be nice to have a comparison pricing even if in a different part of the country.[/QUOTE]
I am fortunate to live fairly close to a great radiator shop (Culpeppers in Portsmouth VA) They charged about $250 to clean both tanks, the connecting pipes and the radiator. In addition the pressure checked the tanks (fixed a problem with the filler neck) and replaced several of the tubes in the radiator. They sprayed the gas tanks with a rust inhibitor (compatible with gasoline). They even painted everything so all I had to do was bolt everything back in.
[/QUOTE]If I may ask, I am not sure what I am seeing in the pic of the remote oil filter line attachment at the block. Is there something different from the stock configuration? If so I hope there is not going to be a clearance issue with the side frame rail. It is very tight there. Barely enough room for a shorty filter plus space to slide it over a block nipple. But again, just not sure what I am seeing in the pic. May well be all okay. I just thought it might be worth asking about. I would hate for you to have a problem when you are getting ready to re-install everything.[/QUOTE]
I'm using the original remote oil filter setup. I just had new hoses made up. They are extremely close to the original hoses so I expect they will fit OK.
[/QUOTE]Also curious about the timing gear fitment problem. Was it because of the mechanical fuel pump eccentric on the front of the cam? I was told it was okay to leave it off since it served no function. The conventional wisdom was that it was cheaper for Ford to leave it on at the time they made the engines rather than change their build process to leave it off. If you put it back on with the old timing gear, that should not be a problem either. Fortunately the old gear is not one of those original nylon ones![/QUOTE]
In the picture of the timing gears the original gear is on the left and it is flat. The new timing gear (on the right) has a boss that is approx 1/4 inch. The problem with the new gear is that it failed to properly locate the camshaft and it had a gross amount of end play. Using original gear solved the problem.
[/QUOTE]For the trivia file, much the same goes for the oil slinger on the crank. Apparently that was really to block oil from getting too much against the timing cover crank seal and causing a leak. I had thought it was to help get oil on the timing chain. Supposedly the seals there are much better now and there is not a problem. But I digress. Looks like you have things well in hand.

[/QUOTE]
I left the slinger and the eccentric that is intended to drive the stock fuel pump on. I'm trying to preserve the car pretty much as it was in the late 60's and using as many of the original parts that is practical. It still has (for now) the Mallory/Shelby dual point distributor on it. I will debate an electronic conversion after I get it running.
Please keep us posted on your progress.
Will do. And I appreciate any suggestions.
Gene