I saw this listing on Hemmings today.
https://www.hemmings.com/listing/19...utm_medium=email&utm_source=daily_marketplace
https://www.hemmings.com/listing/19...utm_medium=email&utm_source=daily_marketplace
My car has a repro tag but on the good side, I have the correct JAL, # matching original valve covers, trans, diff and a TAC cert also Norm gave me a thumbs up to his thoughts that it was that car and did a certificate for itwas recently on bringatrailer, failed to meet reserve, likely due to the reproduction chassis plate
Yes, the market is REALLY soft right now, and I am not sure why.... The key to selling ANY Tiger is a TAC certificate.... w/o that I don't think there is any hope for a positive result. The most important aspect of value is correct tags, and some kind of trail of ownership and history. I've owned these cars for over 20 years (and Healeys as well) it goes up and down. Not so good for speculation, but as an owner who has no desire to sell.... not so important....My car has a repro tag but on the good side, I have the correct JAL, # matching original valve covers, trans, diff and a TAC cert also Norm gave me a thumbs up to his thoughts that it was that car and did a certificate for it
Hoping when the day comes I won't take much of a 'hit' but looks like ALL Tigers are selling low these days
I have to agree, we're aging out. At least my 34 year old daughter still has a love affair with British sportscars! She owns a '79 Spitfire, grew up around my Healeys, and loves to drive the Tiger. She'll get it when I shuffle off my mortal coil!!The softer Tiger values relate to a few things...imho
The 2014 50th anniversary coincided with the early parts of the "hot" period of the asset bubble after the GFC.. so Tiger values in 2014 were rising fast and lots of speculation was going on and quick flipping at profit... This drove the prices well above the actual level of marque enthusiasm and interest.
As that's cooled so have the prices.... Add to that another decade (60 th next year) and the demographic of people who know/desire the cars is shrinking.. so smaller market demand... The new "classic surge" is early 80s-late 90s cars .. even some early 00'ties stuff..
The occasional Tiger will break 100k... But the majority are now 50-80k cars
I used to be one of the younger Tiger owners, buying mine in the mid 2000s when I was in my mid 20s.... Still a younger owner .. but now a middle aged guy .I have to agree, we're aging out. At least my 34 year old daughter still has a love affair with British sportscars! She owns a '79 Spitfire, grew up around my Healeys, and loves to drive the Tiger. She'll get it when I shuffle off my mortal coil!!
This conversation about age came up at the TE/AE United in Canada back in September. You'll find most attendees are of the baby boomer group give or a few years younger or older than the average boomer. This year I think will be #39 for us without missing either a United or a SUNI event. These events are a family reunion. Like many of the regular group we were much younger years ago and the cost to attend was much less and life was different. You'll find a large percentage that bring a Beam have owned the car for a long time. Their kids that rode with Mom & Dad years ago don't make it due to life getting in the way. We have that situation with a kid that is now 40 with three kids, lives in Florida and he grew up behind the seats of our green Alpine. There wasn't a car seat for him. Usually starting late March and continuing thru September or October the wife and I travel the east coast at least once a month for either Brit shows or Vintage racing. Whether we are at Mid Ohio or the Glen for vintage races or whatever show, we find most owners are of the same older age group. We've attended the Import event at Carlisle, Pa. for many years. You'll find the younger folks mainly drive their modified imports. It's amazing what can be done to a Honda. Back in the early 80's the wife turned down a nice Tiger for sale in Columbus with a 10K asking price. She ended up buying our first Harrington instead of the Tiger. The Tiger is still in the area but it couldn't now be bought for 10K.I have to agree, we're aging out. At least my 34 year old daughter still has a love affair with British sportscars! She owns a '79 Spitfire, grew up around my Healeys, and loves to drive the Tiger. She'll get it when I shuffle off my mortal coil!!
It's nice that your kids have embraced the hobby, it's interesting to see the families where the passion for the cars passes down. Doesn't mean they will live in the same area or attend shows with you . But are still engaged with the car .I have to agree, we're aging out. At least my 34 year old daughter still has a love affair with British sportscars! She owns a '79 Spitfire, grew up around my Healeys, and loves to drive the Tiger. She'll get it when I shuffle off my mortal coil!!
I am the owner of this car. I fail to understand the chassis plate issue since everything matches both the TAC and Coventry Archive and factory records.was recently on bringatrailer, failed to meet reserve, likely due to the reproduction chassis plate
Interesting comments. My 1964 Sunbeam Tige MK1 which was downgraded in the comments when on BAT due to the reproduction chassis tag has a confirmed number with the engine, gearbox, rear axle and keys matching the factory records. I have one of the original keys to the car. I have seen other Tiger's up for auction without complete documentation and they got a pass. Why the inconsistant treatment?A couple of anecdotes regarding replacement chassis tags. Several years ago I restored one of the PP (prototype) Tigers. It had a damaged chassis tag that the owner wanted me to replace. I refused. The reason being, a reproduction chassis plate (no matter how accurate), only raises questions about the provenance of the car. You don't want to have to answer a lot of questions about chassis plates unless you absolutely have to.
On that point... I also own an Austin Healey MK2 3000 (type BN7). Only 355 were made and only 350 were sold to the public. This car was stolen in the late 60's and in Washington, when these cars were recovered they generally ended up in wrecking yards and had their chassis and body tags stripped and destroyed.
The person I bought it from (his family) had bought the car in 1971 and only had a wrecking yard bill of sale. The bill of sale did have the correct chassis number, but the tags were long destroyed. Like Tigers, Healeys do not have hidden stampings of the chassis number. I was able to confirm the chassis number through BHMIT with the engine, gearbox, rear axle and key numbers.. The Washington State patrol issued me a new title with the correct chassis number and I had new tags made for the chassis and body numbers. That was in 1989. I have kept all of the documentation so that, if I should ever sell, I have a valid explanation as to why the car has reproduction identity plates.
They didn't necessarily get a pass. Ultimately it's the pool of bidders that make a determination. I was simply stating an opinion. You might remember the Blue Tiger on BAT that wasn't really a Tiger shortly before your listing... It had genuine tags, but as I pointed out in the listing comments, they weren't originally affixed to that car. The car ended up being pulled. It's always best to have little to no questions regarding authenticity. If there is a problem, then be prepared to explain it to a possible buyers satisfaction. If you can't, then there is a potential for problems.Interesting comments. My 1964 Sunbeam Tige MK1 which was downgraded in the comments when on BAT due to the reproduction chassis tag has a confirmed number with the engine, gearbox, rear axle and keys matching the factory records. I have one of the original keys to the car. I have seen other Tiger's up for auction without complete documentation and they got a pass. Why the inconsistant treatment?
View attachment 17140
Well its been a learning experience for me. The 'pool' of bidders or buyers for other than 100% restored collection quality Tigers seems very small now. I reread all the comments for my Tiger and there were no real questions regarding authenticity before the auction closed. The car is currently priced taking into account condition and recent sales.They didn't necessarily get a pass. Ultimately it's the pool of bidders that make a determination. I was simply stating an opinion. You might remember the Blue Tiger on BAT that wasn't really a Tiger shortly before your listing... It had genuine tags, but as I pointed out in the listing comments, they weren't originally affixed to that car. The car ended up being pulled. It's always best to have little to no questions regarding authenticity. If there is a problem, then be prepared to explain it to a possible buyers satisfaction. If you can't, then there is a potential for problems.
Agree, so I just sold my 1964 Tiger at a significant loss and will move on Sold on BAT in April 2020 for $50,500 - I purchased for $62,000 in Feb. 2022 - now worth only $45,000 - less than unrestored value after at least $15,000 in upgrades. - I'll stick to vehicles with better historical retained values or like my 1968 MGB values where I do not have to worry about the $$. I did not do my homework on how thin the market is for Tigers and how many are sitting unsold. Add to this multiple cars being restored in the face of declining demand for the car.Not everything is about money, value or correctness.
Joe,Agree, so I just sold my 1964 Tiger at a significant loss and will move on Sold on BAT in April 2020 for $50,500 - I purchased for $62,000 in Feb. 2022 - now worth only $45,000 - less than unrestored value after at least $15,000 in upgrades. - I'll stick to vehicles with better historical retained values or like my 1968 MGB values where I do not have to worry about the $$. I did not do my homework on how thin the market is for Tigers and how many are sitting unsold. Add to this multiple cars being restored in the face of declining demand for the car.